Historical and Biographical Approaches

Historical and Biographical Approaches 

 Introduction

The Historical and Biographical approaches to literature allow readers to contextualize a literary work within its specific historical moment and the life of its author. Wilfred Guerin and his co-editors emphasize that understanding the time period and the author's life can deepen our understanding of the text, revealing hidden layers of meaning that may not be immediately apparent. These approaches suggest that literary works are not created in isolation but are influenced by the social, political, and cultural forces of their time. This essay will explore how Guerin’s model of the Historical and Biographical approaches (I, IIA, IIB) can be applied to literary analysis, using examples from Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Andrew Marvell’s To His Coy Mistress.

Historical Approach (I)

The Historical Approach examines how a text is shaped by the time in which it was written. It explores the influence of the social, cultural, and political environment on the work, as well as the author’s responses to contemporary events. By placing a literary work in its historical context, readers can understand the underlying messages that might not be obvious without knowledge of the time period.

In Hamlet, for example, understanding the historical context of Elizabethan England provides insight into Hamlet’s preoccupation with power and succession. The play was written during a period of political uncertainty in England, with concerns over who would inherit the throne after Elizabeth I. Similarly, To His Coy Mistress reflects the political and social anxieties of 17th-century England, particularly concerning the brevity of life and the pressure to seize the moment (carpe diem) due to the looming political instability of the time.

---

Main Body

Biographical Approach (IIA)

The Biographical Approach involves examining the life of the author to understand how their personal experiences and background influence their work. By exploring the writer’s life, readers gain insights into the motivations behind their writing, the themes they explore, and the stylistic choices they make. Guerin’s analysis suggests that knowing the author’s life experiences can provide a deeper understanding of their works.

Example from Hamlet:
Shakespeare’s Hamlet was written after the death of his only son, Hamnet, in 1596. This personal tragedy likely influenced the play’s exploration of death, grief, and loss. Hamlet’s famous soliloquy, “To be or not to be: that is the question” (Act 3, Scene 1), can be seen as a reflection of Shakespeare’s personal contemplation of life and death after losing his son. The existential nature of the soliloquy echoes the emotional turmoil Shakespeare himself may have experienced.

Example from To His Coy Mistress:
Andrew Marvell’s To His Coy Mistress can also be analyzed through the Biographical Approach. Marvell’s position as a parliamentarian and a poet during the English Civil War shaped his views on time and urgency. The line “Had we but world enough, and time, / This coyness, lady, were no crime” (lines 1-2) reflects not only the carpe diem theme but also Marvell’s awareness of the fleeting nature of life, possibly shaped by the political upheaval and personal uncertainties of his era.

Historical Context (IIB)

The second part of the Biographical Approach (IIB) focuses on how the historical context of the author’s life influences the themes and concerns of their work. This aspect of the approach goes beyond the author’s personal experiences and examines the broader historical events that shaped their worldview.

Example from Hamlet:
The historical context of Elizabethan England, particularly its concerns over monarchy and succession, permeates Hamlet. The uncertainty of who would succeed Elizabeth I, given her lack of an heir, mirrors the theme of political instability in the play. The line “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark” (Act 1, Scene 4) reflects the general sense of decay and disorder that many in England felt about their own political future.

Example from To His Coy Mistress:
In To His Coy Mistress, the historical context of the English Civil War and the interregnum period shapes the urgency of Marvell’s plea for immediate action. The fear of political instability and the destruction of the old order likely informed Marvell’s reflection on the shortness of life. The line “But at my back I always hear / Time’s wingèd chariot hurrying near” (lines 21-22) can be interpreted as a response to the political chaos of the time, with time personified as a force that pushes individuals to make the most of their lives before inevitable societal collapse.

Integration of Historical and Biographical Approaches

One of the strengths of Guerin’s framework is the ability to integrate both the Historical and Biographical approaches to create a fuller picture of the literary text. By combining insights into the author’s personal life with an understanding of the historical period, readers can gain a deeper understanding of how the text reflects both individual and collective experiences.

Example from Hamlet:
In Hamlet, the integration of Shakespeare’s personal grief over his son’s death and the political uncertainty of Elizabethan England can be seen in the complex portrayal of Hamlet’s character. Hamlet’s introspection and contemplation of mortality are not just personal but are also reflections of larger concerns about the fragility of life and the instability of political power.

Example from To His Coy Mistress:
In To His Coy Mistress, Marvell’s personal experience as a politician during a time of war and social unrest adds another layer to the poem’s carpe diem theme. His sense of urgency to “seize the day” is not just a reflection of romantic desire but also a response to the instability and unpredictability of life during a time of political upheaval.

---

Conclusion

The Historical and Biographical Approaches, as discussed by Wilfred Guerin et al., provide valuable tools for understanding literature. By considering both the historical context and the personal experiences of the author, readers can gain insights into the themes, characters, and messages of a text that may not be immediately apparent. In the case of Hamlet, Shakespeare’s personal grief and the political uncertainty of his time come together to create a powerful meditation on life, death, and power. Similarly, Marvell’s To His Coy Mistress reflects both his personal experiences and the larger social and political anxieties of 17th-century England. Through these approaches, literature can be understood as both a product of its time and a reflection of the author’s individual experiences.

Orientation of Critical Theories M.H. ABRAMS

 Lesson -1

 Orientation of Critical Theories M.H. ABRAMS

 1.0 Objectives 

After reading this lesson, you will be able to:

 ● account for the historical development of critical theories/lenses to approach literature 

● provide a critical summary of the prescribed text in lucid and comprehensive terms. 

● discuss the theoretical nuances of the text. 

● Identify a range of questions that can be discussed within the scope of the prescribed text.

 1.1 Introduction

 Today we tend to think of the work of art in terms of the artist, who, acting through his powers of imagination, wilfully brings into being his creation. But this artist-cantered interpretation of the text is 6 really a more recent development, first seen in the early nineteenth century. In this lesson you will see how Abrams demonstrates in the "Orientation of Critical Theories" chapter of his book The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic theory and the Critical Tradition (1953), the dominant modes of thinking about art have, throughout history, been rather different. From Plato until the late 18th century the artist was thought to play a back-seat role in the creation of art. He was regarded as no more than "a mirror," reflecting nature either as it exists or as it is perfected or enhanced through the mirror. This artist-as-mirror conception remained dominant until the advent of the Romantic era (Abrams sets the date around 1800), when the artist began to make his transformation from “mirror” to “lamp” ―- a lamp that actively participates in the object it illuminates.

 1.2 Introducing the Author and his Work M.H. Abrams, 

in full Meyer Howard Abrams, (born July 23, 1912, Long Branch, New Jersey, U.S.—died April 21, 2015, Ithaca, New York), American literary critic who revolutionized the study of the Romantic period in English literature through ground-breaking analysis. He also served as general editor (1962–2000) for the first seven editions of The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Abrams wrote his first book, The Milk of Paradise: The Effects of Opium Visions on the Works of De Quincey, Crabbe, Francis Thompson, and Coleridge (1934), while an undergraduate. With his second work, The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition (1953), an expanded version of his Ph.D. dissertation, he joined the front rank of Romantic-literature scholars. The book’stitle denotes the two metaphors by which Abrams characterized 18th- and 19th-century English literature, respectively—the former as a cool, intellectual reflection of outward reality and the latter as an illumination shed by artists upon their inner and outer worlds. Natural Supernaturalism (1971) explores a broader reach of the Romantic sensibility, including its religious implications and itsinfluence on modern literature. Further critical essays by Abrams on Romantic topics were collected in The Correspondent Breeze (1984). From his collections Literature and Belief (1958) and In Search of Literary Theory (1972) to his A Glossary of Literary Terms (1957; 8th ed., 2005), Abrams was consistently concerned with analyzing literary theory and criticism. His introductory chapter to The Mirror and the Lamp was influential in distinguishing four critical “orientations” by which literary works are examined: the mimetic, which sees artworks as imitating the world and human life; the pragmatic, which sees artworks in their achievement of effects on an audience; the expressive, which sees artworks primarily in relation to their producers; and the objective, which looks at the relationships between the parts of the artwork itself.

 1.3 Summary of the Text 

The essay Orientation of Critical Theories’ is the first chapter of the book The Mirror and the Lamp by M.H. Abrams. In the book Abrams speaks about the two ways in which literature or literary theories try to interpret the human mind – first the mind as a mirror that reflects the external objects and second as a lamp that throws light at the objects it sees. The first approach is related to the mimetic theories ofcriticismandthesecondapproachisrelatedtotheromanticidealofthepowerofthemindtointerpretwhat it sees. In this essay Abrams speaks about how different critical theories tend to display an orientation towards a particular element of a work of art by dividing these theories based upon their orientations. 7 This essay is divided by Abrams into five parts. The first part deals with the coordinates of art criticism. Abrams says that any critical theory consists of four elements with the help of which they comprehend art. The first element is the work of art and the second element is the artist. The third element is the source of the work, the objects or situations that the work describes or reflects or has some relation to. This is commonly referred to as ‘nature’ but Abrams uses themore inclusive term ‘universe’. The fourth element is the audience. Abrams arranges these four elements in a triangular diagram with the work of art at the centre and the universe, audience and the artist as the three coordinates. He says that any critical theory while dealing with all the four elements shows a significant orientation towards only one of these elements and judges the value of the work by focusing on one element as its principal criteria. Thus all critical theories can be divided into four broad categories depending upon their orientation towards the elements. The first category deals with the importance of the universe in the work of art. The second category deals with the influence of the work on its audience. The third orients towards the artist’s role in the process of creation of the work of art and the fourth category deals with the work as a singular entity. Abrams however says that the four elements vary according to the theories in which they appear. The second part of the essay deals with mimetic theories. The critical theories that deal with mimesis are oriented towards the universe and its role in the work of art. This theory first appeared in Plato’sRepublic. Plato’s theory of mimesis operates upon three categories – the ideal world, the physical world and the world of art. This theory holds that the physical world is an imitation of the Ideal world and art is an imitation of the physical world. Thus art is twice removed from reality. This idea is famously explained by Socrates in the tenth book of the Republic where he says that there are threebeds– one the idea of the bed, second a physical bed made by the carpenter who imitates the ideal bed and the third is the bed painted by the artist. The bed of the artist is twice removed from the idea of the bed. Thus according to this theory all works are judged on the basis of their relation to Ideas. Since ideas are considered true and beautiful the distance of art from ideas emphasizes its distance from beauty and truth. Aristotle’s Poetics is the next great work of criticism with a mimetic orientation. Aristotle defines poetry as imitation. He also distinguishes between different kinds of imitation based on the objects imitated, themanner of imitation, and the medium of imitation. With the help of these distinctions Aristotle is able to separate poetry from other art forms and then make distinctions between different kinds of poetry - epic, drama, tragedy and comedy. Similarly while focusing on tragedy Aristotle breaks it into distinct individual parts - plot, characters, thought, temperament, diction etc. - which constitute the whole.Aristotle's criticism thus not only concerns art as art but also poetry as poetry, and each kind of poetry according to its individual characteristics. Thus it is seen that Aristotle's criticism also displays a slight orientation towards the work itself. Another characteristic feature of Poetics is that it evaluates art or specifically tragedy based on its effect upon the audience. Thus Aristotle's criticism is very flexible and cannot be easily classified into one form of orientation. Nevertheless, the mimetic orientation remains the most prominent in Aristotle's criticism. It is however important to note that Aristotle's criticism does not pay much attention to the role of the poet's individual feelings or emotions in the creation of a work of art. In Poetics the poet appears only to be advised about how plot is to be constructed and how diction is to be chosen. Plato on the other hand considers the poet from the political point of view. In the third part of the essay Abrams speaks about the theories that display an orientation towards the relationship of the work of art to its audience. Abrams terms these theories as pragmatic theories. Pragmatic theories view the arts as a means of achieving an end and judges the value of art based upon its success in achieving that end. For pragmatic critics poetry is a means to achieve certain 8 responses from its readers. Sir Philip Sidney's ‘An Apology for Poetry’ is the first text that displays pragmatic criticism. According to Sidney the purpose of poetry is to teach and delight. Sidney judges the value of poetry by analysing its effect upon its audience. He says that poets are different from historians because they communicate what may be or should be rather than what has been or shall be. Sidney raises the poet above philosophers and historians because it is only the poet who is the most successful in communicating with his audience. This is because he combines the fact of the historian and the morals of the philosopher and disguises it in a form that not only teaches but also delights. The classical theory of rhetoric can be viewed as the origin of pragmatic theories as rhetoric is universally regarded as a powerful instrument of persuasion among an audience. Horace discusses this theory in his work ArsPoetica. Horace advises poets to write poetry with the aim to blend usefulness with pleasure. To teach, to please and to move are the three aesthetic effects to be achieved upon a reader. Pragmatic criticism is mostly concerned with formulating rules, guidelines and methods for achieving the desired effects upon the audience. The rules are often derived from the qualities present in classical literary works which have stood the test of time or from an understanding of psychology. These rules help the artist in the process of creation and the critic in the process of evaluation. Most eighteenth century critics believed in the strength of these rules. Therefore, describing and demonstrating rules and guidelines became a popular trend in the critical texts of that time. Richard Herd’s 'Dissertation of the idea of universal poetry' is another critical text concerning pragmatic criticism. According to Hurd universal poetry is the art whose purpose is to provide the maximum amount of pleasure possible. In order to achieve this effect Hurd proposes three properties - figurative language, fiction andversification. According to Hurd, since the aim of poetry is to gratify the mind of the reader, knowledge of the mind is important while establishing these rules. Johnson’s "Preface to Shakespeare" is one of the most important texts dealing with pragmatic criticism. Johnson combines the mimetic criteria of evaluation with the aesthetic effects upon the audience in order to judge works of art. Johnson says that Shakespeare holds before his readers a faithful mirror of manner and life. But Johnson also states that the aim of poetry is to instruct as well as please. Therefore, the fact that Shakespeare has survived the test of time as a poet whose works are read for little reason other than pleasure is proof that a work of art that truly imitates nature will continue to please its audience for a long time. Shakespeare's ability to hold up a mirror of life to his audience is the major criteria upon which Johnson judges the effect of his works on the audience. Abrams notes that the pragmatic orientation has been the principal aesthetic attitude of western criticism beginning from Horace up to the eighteenth century. However with the development of science and increased knowledge of psychology particularly after the influence of the works of Hobbes and Locke in the seventeen century, the poet and his mental capacities gradually became the focal point of criticism and the orientation of critical theories turned from the audience to the artist. The fourth part of the essay deals with the critical theories oriented towards the relation between the work and the artist which Abrams calls the expressive theory of art. The expressive orientation is found in the works of Longinus in his discussions of the sublime which according to Longinus has its sources in the poet's thoughts and emotions. However Abrams considers the year 1800 marked by the publication of Wordsworth's Preface to the Lyrical Ballads as the date when the expressive orientation begins to surface in English literary criticism. The expressive theories are a product of the Romantic Movement which emphasized on the power of the poet's mind. According to the expressive theory a work of art is an external manifestation of internal thoughts and feelings. The creative process is a result of the impulses of feeling combined with the poet's thoughts and perceptions which is the primary source of his works. The poet also converts aspects of the external world into poetry with the help of his mind. The poet’s mind therefore is the central point of attention in an expressive theory. The expressive 9 theories evaluate poetry by trying to figure out whether the diction and figures of speech are a natural outcome of the poet's emotions or a deliberate effort. The expressive theory tries to answer the questions of sincerity and authenticity of poetry along with the poem's correspondence to the actual feeling and state of the poet's mind. The work of art is no longer viewed as a mirror of the universe but as an insight to the poet's mind. In the fifth and last part of the essay Abrams discusses the objective theories of criticism which isolate a work of art and evaluate it as an independent entity. The orientation of objective theories is thus towards the work of art alone irrespective of its source, artist or audience. One of the early attempts at objective criticism is seen in Aristotle's Poetics. Aristotle tries to analyse tragedy by considering it as anindividual whole consisting of parts such as plot and characters. The objective orientation begins to emerge significantly in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Some critics triedtounderstand a poem as a 'heterocosm' i.e. a whole, independent world complete in itself. This aim of critics to consider a work or poem as a singular element without any external reference is termed by historians as ' art for art's sake'. Thus it is seen that Abrams divides critical theories into four categories based upon their orientation - first the mimetic theories which orient towards the universe, secondly the pragmatic theories concerning the audience, thirdly the expressive theories focusing on the artist and finally the objective theories revolving around the work of art itself. However towards the end of the essay Abrams returns to Romanticism and its expressive theories. This is because it is during the Romantic period that the critical theories begin to view the mind of the poet not as a mirror of nature but as a 'lamp' which sheds light on its own creation. Abrams' return to Romanticism justifies the purpose of his book where he tries to explain the two ways in which a poet's mind is interpreted- as a mirror and as a lamp. 

1.4 Critical Analysis of the Text 

This is the first chapter of the book, The Mirror and the Lamp, by Abrams. Abrams explains the title of the book thus: “The title of the book identifies two common and antithetical metaphors of the mind”.One of the metaphors compares the mind to a reflector (mirror). The other (lamp) is a radiant projector, which gives light to others. From Plato to the 18th century, creative writers considered mind as a mere reflector of external realities. But during the Romantic period this idea changed and minds is considered as something that illuminates and gives a new appearance to external realities. The principal object of Abram’s study is the suppression of the first idea by the second. The first chapter also gives a brief survey of criticism. Thus the essay is a very good introduction to modern criticism. Abrams says that today art is considered in relation to the artist. Its relation to external nature or to the audience is not given much importance. The field of aesthetic studies is very confusing. I.A. Richards gave the heading “The Chaos of Critical Theories” to the first chapter of his book, Principles of Literary Criticism. A good deal of the confusion is caused because of the belief that criticism is a physical or psychological science. The aim of criticism is not to establish correlations between facts. On the other hand it aims to establish principles that will help us to explain interpret and evaluate the aesthetic facts. Aesthetic facts are different from reality. They are not true in the strict scientific sense. Literary theory, Abrams holds, can be divided into four categories: mimetic theories, which focus on the relationship between text and universe (by "universe" he means all things of the world apart from audience, text and author); pragmatic theories, which are interested in the relationship between text and audience; expressive theories, which are concerned with the text-author relationship; and objective theories, the most recent classification, which focus on analysis of the text in isolation. Because nothing exists other than universe, text, author and audience, any form of theory must fit into one of these four categories, or be a combination of several. 10 

1.4.1. Mimetic Theories

 The first category of mimetic theories forms the oldest and is, according to Abrams, the “mostprimitive” of the four categories. According to this theory, the artist is an imitator of aspects of the observable universe. In The Republic, Plato divides his universe into three realms: the realm of ideas, the realm of particulars, and the realm of reflections of particulars (i.e., art and other "shadows"). The realm of reflections of particulars is the furthest removed from the realm of ideas (i.e., "ultimate truth"), and is therefore the lowest ranking of the three realms. Consequently, its practice, namely, mimetic art, is heldin low regard. Plato's mentor Socrates seemed to agree with Plato's thesis, as he too ranked the third realm― mimetic art― at the bottom. In his famous analogy of the three beds, Socrates refers to the first bed, Bed 1, as the bed of the gods, or of the realm of ideas. Bed 2 is the bed I lie in, the carpenter’s bed, which is the bed of the realm of particulars. Bed 3, the bed in the painting, is a representation of a representation of the ideal bed. Thus, being twice removed from the ideal bed, it is the most "untrue" of the three. Aristotle points out, however, that the value of Bed 3 (the painter’s bed) is not dependent upon its relation to Bed 1 (the bed of the gods or ideal truth). Art, rather, is independent and should be assessed on its own terms. Aristotle thus frees the text from its relation to the universe to which Plato and Socrates bound it, while still acknowledging the text's imitative relation to universe. Aristotle shows that it is the "manner of imitation" and not the relation to truth which is important in art and that aesthetic evaluation should be based on the assessment of both the "manner of imitation" and the emotional effect produced in the audience. 

1.4.2. Pragmatic Theories 

The second type of theories is pragmatic theories, which are concerned with the relation between text and audience. According to Abrams, these theories have constituted the dominant mode of analysis from Horace to the early 19th century, and much of its terminology is borrowed from ancient rhetoric. Horace argued in his ArsPoeticathat the three functions of poetry are to teach, to please, and to move. Cicero, the Church Fathers, and the Italian guides all developed a theory of poetry through this reinterpretation of Aristotle, and it was Sir Philip Sydney who in his Apologie for Poetry expanded Aristotle's theories into a specifically didactic theory of poetry. Sydney argues that poets differ from historians in that, unlike historians who deal only with what has been, poets also deal with what may be, and that such moral utopianism is what makes poetry, specifically epic poetry, and superior to history. The 18th-century critics, always itching to extract from specific works some a priori rule, began to prescribe guidelines that they hoped would assist future poets. Dryden dabbles in this sort of rulebook-criticism, explaining certain “universals” for “pleasing” in poetry. Other examples are to be found in the aesthetic “rulebooks” of Richard Hurd and in the writings of Charles Bateaux. Samuel Johnson, however, was sceptical of such “rulebooks,” and expressed a mistrust of a priori laws in his work, “A Preface to Shakespeare,” which proved to be a “monumental work of neoclassical criticism.” In it, he praises Shakespeare’s talent for imitation; but, above all, he commends Shakespeare’s ability to “instruct by pleasing.” Next, it was the psychological introspection of Hobbes and Locke which paved the way for the third,artist-cantered approach to the text. 11 

1.4.3. Expressive Theories (Two Centuries of the Self) 

By 1800, we begin to see “the displacement of mimetic and pragmatic by the expressive view of art,” a phenomenon due in part to the writings of Longinus, Bacon, Wordsworth, and, later, the radical Romantics of the 1830s. With this new “expressive view” of art, the primary duty of the artist was no longer to serve as a mirror reflecting outer things, but instead to externalize the internal, and make one's “inner life” the primary subject of art. The external world, when it does happen to sneak into the work, is expressed only as heavily filtered noumena. It is around this time in the early 19th century that the “mirror,” which had hitherto been the conventional symbol for the artist, becomes the “lamp.” The danger of such an inward turn is, of course, that it can lead to the cult of subjectivity and emotion, and that the criteria for art is degraded to the reductive: Is the text a sincere, genuine, and accurate reflection of the inner mind of the poet? Such fears are to be realized in later Romantic poetry, much of which abounds in solipsism, bathos, and excessive introspection. The most extreme tenets of Romanticism of this era are perhaps best exemplified in the following assertions made by John Stewart Mills in his Romantic manifestos: “What is Poetry?” & “The Two Kinds of Poetry” published in 1883. Mills upturns the old ranking as laid down by Aristotle, arguing that: the lyrical form usurps the dramatic; spontaneity is far more valuable than form or conceit; imitation of the external world is not important (rather, the external world is merely a tool used to express the internal state of mind of the poet); and finally, the presence of an audience is entirely unnecessary. To give an overview of the evolution of Western aesthetics up to this point, Abrams provides the following rough timeline. In the age of Plato and Aristotle, poets were mimetic poets, and their personal roles and intrusions were kept to a minimum. In the Hellenistic and Roman eras, poets were pragmatic, and they sought to satisfy the public, abide by the rules of decorum, and apply techniques borrowed from rhetoric. From 1800 to 1900, poets, specifically those of England and Germany, were triumphant and self-affirming figures whose task was to express to the world their inner genius. Finally, from the early 1900s through the present, the objective theories, such as those expounded by T.S. Eliot, the New Critics and others, have been most prominent. (Abram's last point, however, seems debatable given the fact of the New Critics' decline in the second half of the 20th century.) 

1.4.4. Objective Theories

 Though extremely rare in pre-20th-century history, this fourth alternative― to view the text in isolation― has been the dominant mode for criticism for at least half of the 20th century. Proponents of this theory trace its origins to the central section of Aristotle’s Poetics, where tragedy is regarded as an object in itself, and where the work's internal elements (plot, character, thought, diction, melody andspectacle, in order of importance) are described as working together in perfect unison to produce in the audience a “catharsis” of pity and fear. The important point, the objective theorists point out, is that these qualities are treated by Aristotle as inherent in the work itself, and that the work is praised to the extent that these internal elements work together cohesively. Still, some might counter that Aristotle’s Poetics, with its careful attention paid to the effect produced upon the audience, in fact more closely fits the criteria of the pragmatic theories than of the objective theories. As translations into Latin were scarce, Aristotle’s influence disappeared for centuries until the Renaissance, when we see the re-emergence of his ideas in new forms. Yet it is not until the 1780s in Germany that we see a significant objective theory brought forth. During this period from 1780-1820, and in large part as a consequence of Kant’s writings, an “art-for-art’s-sake” movement began to emerge. Under this new theory, the poem came to be considered a “heterocosm” which functions 12 independently and according to its own set of rules. But it is not until the first half of the 20th century― with its High Modernism, Chicago Neo-Aristotelianism, and other schools― that this art-for-art's-sake movement would place the objective theories in a position of ascendancy over the other critical orientations. 

1.5 Summary

 In this lesson you read how M.H. Abrams summed up the theories of literary criticism and classified them into categories. Further, how the criteria of classification are based on the relative emphasis placed on the four components - the art, the maker, the subject and the audience. The difference among various theories of art lies largely in the varying emphasis that is placed on one or more of the four elements. This will help the critic in analyzing a work of art. Explaining this M.H. Abrams says, “That is, a critic tends to derive from one of these terms his principal categories for defining, classifying, and analyzing a work of art, as well as the major criteria by which he judges its value.” You also read on how Abrams clearly identifies himself as a critical theorist, not a philosopher, not a psychologist, not a scientist. From his perspective, the purpose and function of critical theory is not to discover some "verifiable truth" but to "establish principles enabling us to justify, order, and clarify our interpretation and appraisal of the aesthetic. 1.6 Glossary 1. Mimesis: When art imitates life, it is mimesis. The word is Greek and means “imitation” (though in the sense of “re-presentation” rather than of “copying”). Plato and Aristotle spoke of mimesis as the re-presentation of nature. 2. Pragmatic: Pragmatic criticism is concerned, first and foremost, with the ethical impact any literary text has upon an audience. Regardless of art's other merits or failings, the primary responsibility or function of art is social in nature. Assessing, fulfilling, and shaping the needs, wants, and desires of an audience should be the first task of an artist. 3. Objectivity: Being objective suggests that you are concerned about facts and are not influenced by personal feelings or biases. Objectivity is a philosophical concept of being true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination. 4. Expressive Criticism: Expressive criticism describes poetry as an expression, as an over-flow of a poet's feelings. Expressive criticism is unlike many other forms of criticism in that it does not focus on the style of writing, or grammar, or diction; it focuses on what is being said by the author.

Chapter 6 of Wilfred Guerin‘s Handbook: The Psychological Approach: Freud (I, IIA, IIG)

 "Freud's Psychological Approach in Literary Criticism: Exploring the Unconscious in Literature"

Introduction to the Psychological Approach 

The Psychological Approach in literary criticism offers a fascinating method of analyzing characters, themes, and texts by using principles of psychology. Central to this approach is the work of Sigmund Freud, whose theories of the unconscious mind, psychosexual development, and dream analysis transformed not only psychology but also literary criticism. By applying Freudian theory, critics can explore the deeper, often hidden meanings within literature, especially in relation to characters' internal struggles, repressed desires, and psychological motivations.

Freud's theories have been widely influential across disciplines. Literature, in particular, offers a rich ground for psychoanalytic study because of its ability to represent complex human emotions and relationships. Writers often unconsciously reflect their own psychological states in their works, making Freud’s theories an ideal tool for interpreting literature.

This essay will focus on how Freud’s ideas, as explored in Chapter 6 of Wilfred Guerin’s Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature, are used to analyze literature. Sections I, IIA, and IIG outline Freud’s main contributions to literary criticism and demonstrate how his theories can be applied to texts to reveal deeper psychological dimensions. These sections will be analyzed in-depth, with examples of their application to literary works, particularly focusing on character motivations, narrative structures, and symbolic elements.

Sigmund Freud’s Contribution to Literary Criticism (Section I)  

Freud’s Biography and Influence

Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) was an Austrian neurologist who founded the field of psychoanalysis, a method for treating psychopathology through dialogue between a patient and a psychoanalyst. Freud’s pioneering work in the late 19th and early 20th centuries changed how people understood the human mind. His concepts of the unconscious mind, repression, and the significance of dreams have shaped both clinical psychology and cultural studies, including literature.

Freud’s focus on the unconscious is crucial to his influence on literary criticism. He proposed that much of human behavior is driven by unconscious desires and fears, often rooted in early childhood experiences. This idea of the unconscious allowed literary critics to analyze texts in ways that go beyond surface meanings, enabling them to explore hidden desires, anxieties, and conflicts that shape the behavior of literary characters.

Theories and Key Concepts

Freud introduced several key concepts that are central to both psychoanalysis and literary criticism:

• The Unconscious Mind: According to Freud, the mind is divided into three parts—the id, ego, and superego. The id represents primal desires and impulses, the superego is the moral conscience, and the ego mediates between the two. In literature, characters often display conflicts between these forces, revealing inner psychological tension.

• Psychosexual Development: Freud’s theory of psychosexual development posits that individuals pass through stages of development (oral, anal, phallic, latency, and genital), and unresolved conflicts in these stages can manifest in neuroses or psychological difficulties later in life. This theory has been used to explain the motivations of literary characters, particularly those with repressed desires or unfulfilled longings.

• Dream Analysis: Freud believed that dreams are a way for the unconscious to express repressed thoughts and desires. In literature, dream sequences often reveal hidden aspects of a character’s psyche. Freud’s method of dream interpretation—distinguishing between manifest content (the literal storyline of the dream) and latent content (the hidden, symbolic meaning)—can be applied to dream sequences in literary works.

Freud and Literature

Freud’s theories are particularly applicable to literature because literary texts often depict the complexities of human psychology. Freud believed that art and literature could be viewed as expressions of the unconscious, with authors potentially using their works to explore unresolved conflicts, anxieties, and desires. By applying Freudian analysis to literature, critics can uncover the symbolic and thematic significance of texts in ways that traditional approaches might miss.

For example, in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Freud’s Oedipus Complex has been widely discussed in relation to Hamlet’s relationship with his mother, Gertrude, and his murderous rage towards his uncle, Claudius. Hamlet’s inner conflict can be seen as a reflection of unconscious desires and repressed emotions, which Freud’s theories help to unpack.

Freudian Analysis in Literary Criticism (Section IIA)  

Key Concepts in Freudian Literary Criticism

Several of Freud’s theories have become integral to literary criticism:

• Repression and Sublimation: In Freud’s view, individuals repress desires that are socially unacceptable, pushing them into the unconscious. However, these repressed desires often surface in creative ways through sublimation, where the individual channels unacceptable impulses into socially acceptable forms, such as art and literature. In literature, this theory can be used to explain why characters behave in particular ways or why certain themes recur in an author’s work.

• The Oedipus Complex: One of Freud’s most famous theories, the Oedipus Complex, suggests that young boys experience a desire for their mothers and a rivalry with their fathers. This theory has been applied to numerous literary works, most famously in Hamlet, where Hamlet’s complex relationship with his mother and his ambivalence towards his father-figure Claudius can be seen as manifestations of repressed Oedipal desires.

• Defense Mechanisms: Freud identified several defense mechanisms that individuals use to protect themselves from painful realities. These include projection (attributing one’s own unacceptable thoughts to others), displacement (shifting emotional responses from the intended target to a safer target), and denial (refusing to accept reality). In literary analysis, these defense mechanisms can be observed in characters’ behavior, helping critics understand their motivations and internal conflicts.

Applying Freud to Character Analysis

Freudian analysis offers valuable insights into character motivations. For example, in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, Jay Gatsby’s obsession with Daisy can be viewed through the lens of repression and idealization. Gatsby’s pursuit of Daisy represents a longing for an unattainable ideal, one that masks deeper insecurities and unresolved issues from his past. Gatsby’s inability to attain Daisy can be seen as a reflection of Freud’s idea that repressed desires often remain unfulfilled.

Similarly, in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein’s creation of the monster can be interpreted as an expression of repressed fears and desires. The monster represents the darker aspects of Frankenstein’s psyche—his ambition, guilt, and fear of failure.

Dream Analysis in Fiction

Freudian dream analysis also plays a crucial role in interpreting literature. Dream sequences in novels often reflect characters’ unconscious desires and fears. For instance, in Wuthering Heights, Catherine’s dream about being in heaven yet wanting to return to the moors reveals her internal conflict and longing for the wild, untamed life that Heathcliff represents. Freud’s distinction between manifest and latent content helps critics decipher the underlying psychological meanings of such dreams.

Freud’s Influence on Modern Criticism (Section IIG)  

Modern Adaptations of Freudian Theory

Freud’s influence extends far beyond his lifetime, with many modern literary critics continuing to apply his theories. While Freudian criticism has evolved, the core idea that literature can reflect unconscious desires remains relevant. Modern adaptations of Freud’s ideas have been incorporated into psychoanalytic criticism, including the work of Jacques Lacan, who revised Freudian ideas through the lens of language and symbolism.

Examples of Freudian Criticism in Modern Works

Freudian criticism continues to be applied to modern literature. In novels like The Catcher in the Rye, critics have used Freudian analysis to explore Holden Caulfield’s psychological state, particularly his repression of grief and his subconscious fear of growing up.

Critiques of Freudian Literary Criticism

While Freud’s ideas remain influential, they have also been criticized for being overly deterministic and focused on sexuality. Some critics argue that Freud’s theories, particularly his emphasis on the Oedipus Complex, are reductive and fail to account for the complexities of human behavior. Others point out that Freud’s theories reflect the gender norms of his time and may not be universally applicable.

Beyond Freud

In recent years, psychoanalytic criticism has expanded beyond Freud to include the work of later theorists like Lacan, who emphasized language and the symbolic order. Nevertheless, Freud’s foundational ideas about the unconscious and repression continue to shape literary criticism.

Case Studies: Freudian Analysis of Classic Works  

Freud and Shakespeare

Freud’s theories have been applied extensively to Shakespeare’s works, particularly Hamlet. The Oedipus Complex is often cited in analyses of Hamlet’s relationship with his mother, Gertrude, and his uncle, Claudius. Hamlet’s ambivalence towards Claudius and his hesitation in avenging his father’s death can be interpreted as signs of repressed Oedipal desires.

Freudian Reading of Greek Tragedies

Freud’s interpretation of the myth of Oedipus Rex forms the basis of his Oedipus Complex. The play, in which Oedipus unknowingly kills his father and marries his mother, provides a template for Freud’s theory of repressed desires and the unconscious.

Modern Novels

Freudian concepts have also been applied to modern works, such as Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. In this novel, Kurtz’s descent into madness and moral corruption can be interpreted as a result of repressed desires and the breakdown of the ego.

Conclusion  

In conclusion, Freud’s contributions to literary criticism have provided valuable tools for analyzing literature through the lens of human psychology. By focusing on the unconscious mind, repression, and psychosexual development, Freud opened new pathways for understanding characters and narratives in literature. Despite some criticisms, Freudian analysis remains a powerful approach for uncovering the deeper psychological meanings in texts. Whether applied to classic works like Hamlet or modern novels like The Great Gatsby, Freud’s theories continue to shape the field of literary criticism.

The Challenge of Literary Movements FRANCOIS JOST

The Challenge of Literary Movements

FRANCOIS JOST

What is a literary movement? Apparently, this is an easy question to answer. Merriam-Webster says: a movement is an "act or process of moving." Therefore, a literary movement is the act or process by which literature moves: there is a progression. And literature moves, the whole of it, not only certain parts or particles of it. Thus, at the end of a specific movement, literature will be in another place, posi- tion or posture to paraphrase my dictionary than it was at the beginning. But what is literature? In the present context a simple definition may suffice: it is the aesthetic expression, by means of words, of all that which concerns man. It is neither only poetics, nor only aesthetics, neither just sociology nor just philosophy. It is not a mere Wortanschauung or a mere Weltanschauung, but both, and not separately, but jointly. It happens that Merriam-Webster has been relegated to the rare book room and that, oddly enough, everything I have said so far smacks of common sense, a tool perfectly inept for the pursuit of criticism. We should not wonder, therefore, that in handbooks on literary studies "movements" are discussed as static phenomena, while in manuals on physics they are examined in chapters on dynam- ics. A movement, in our distinguished profession, has come to mean a period or an epoch, an era or an age. There are quite a few other pseudo-synonyms, such as trends and schools, circles and coteries. Some critics have doubted the usefulness of movement studies and of literary periodization as well. Each work, they have argued, stand- ing by its own virtue and merits, is unique. Its evaluation, therefore, should not take place within the framework of a period or a genre. There is at least one obvious answer to that objection. No appraisal is possible without implicit or explicit comparisons. Value judgments are based on a set of rules governing the field of aesthetics; clearly, by itself and viewed in isolation no poem is either good or bad. Thus, to ignore comparison amounts to discarding critical appraisals. But who made the rules? The authors themselves by tacitly or overtly compet- ing with their peers; in doing so they give momentum a word re- lated to movement to literary life. The analysis of the driving forces, the dynamics of literature, thestudy of its motor, so to speak, to use again a term derived from movere like movement, suggests some challenging thoughts. I should  like to divide them into three parts. It is first necessary to clarify thenature of literary movements; then, to answer questions concerning the role of aesthetic and stylistic movements in literary history; and, finally, to ask ourselves what are the consequences of the separation of aesthetics and stylistics from the whole of literature, not only for literary history but for criticism as well.

1

History teaches us that philosophies have long gestation periods: several decades, most often. By the time one philosophy reaches ma- turity, after centuries, perhaps, the next one may already have been conceived. Since philosophy, by which I mean a basic view and inter- pretation of all things human, is an essential part of literature, literary movements have to encompass a substantial span of time. Gongorism, or Jugendstil, or costumbrismo are not literary movements properly speaking. It appears that Western Literature, so far, has experienced very few movements and a a hundred moves. One may possibly distin- guish six or seven: Classicism, Medievalism, Renaissance, Enlighten- ment, Romanticism, Realism, and, the movement which has not yet been christened and to which I would give the name of Socialism or Materialism, if the terms were not encumbered with so many politi- cal and economic implication This is not the place to expound on the characteristics of the ma- jor movements of the West. Within the stream of the present reason- ing, however, a few remarks about their qualities and properties have to be made. Classicism happens to be the locus classicus of the in- separableness of form and content. The supreme principle of Peri Poletikes rests on imitation, on mimesis, that is, imitation of real life, of significant situations that may present themselves in life, and funda- mental attitudes towards life. Sophocles' tragedies are not just plays, but applied theology and psychology, and Homer's poems are not just songs: they are history and mythology, anthropology and geog raphy; in brief, both are epitomes the Weltbild, of the hu- man condition at the time of their authors. The Romans showed views similar to those of the Greeks. De Arte Poetica may find in the "utile et dulce" its summary, and the phrase means that in every masterpiece reason and aesthetic emotion have to merge, a conditio sine qua non for excellence. In this work, Horace does not even men- tion lyrical poetry, and obviously Aristotle assumes that his friends and disciples read his poetics with his whole philosophical thought in mind. Classicism is not confined to specific centuries. Its doctrine per- vades all individual literatures of the West, not simultaneously nor always to the same extent, to be sure. Classical highlights are seen in seventeenth-century France with Corneille and Racine, and in lateeighteenth-century Germany, culminating in Goethe's "edler Einfalt" and "stiller Grösse," in thought and form. Yet, contemporary criti- cism, sometimes, shows a tendency to emphasize the importance of classical forms at the expense of the exegesis of classical thought. In a sense, however, classicism is beyond the traditional notion of move- ment in so far as it is a recurring phenomenon, defying any clear limi- tation in time. This is not the case with medievalism, although it encompasses a full millenium and spurred remarkable interest within other literary movements, especially that of Romanticism. Most relevant to our subject is the fact that medievalism is endowed with a philosophical soul, theocentrism, which will be converted into anthropocentrism, a change that gave birth to the Renaissance, a movement which im- parted new orientations and new meaning to human existence and, therefore, had far reaching implications for the arts, including the letters. Yet, some modern critics have isolated the formal elements of the entire Renaissance movement; thus the baroque was declared a full-fledged literary movement, even though it seldom transcends aesthetics or poetics. Let us briefly look at another metamorphosis. After the emergence of an enlightened bourgeoisie, Romanticism dominated several coun- tries, but rather quickly changed into Realism, Materialism and So- cialism, this word being stripped of any specific overtones referring to modern ideologies, and used merely in a literary sense. If in Ro- manticism we consider only issues related to philosophical substance and basic interpretations of our existence, the movement may be de- fined as a quest for the self, a victory of the individual over the col- lective, the proclamation of sovereign independence of the human person from any group of human beings. Romanticism rests on the antagonism between the self and society. Socialism, literary Social- ism, on the contrary, rests on the alliance between the self and so- ciety, since society is called upon to protect the self. The crucial idea of Rousseau's Contrat social, published in 1761, bore abundant fruit over the following two centuries. All these reflections may be those of a "terrible simplificateur"; they are intended as an introduction to my major issue: in literary movements, which are necessarily related to primary cultural units, we have to identify and reconcile thematics and styles, matters and manners, "Gehalt" and "Gestalt". This identification and reconciliation is the object and objective of literature, the body of which may conveniently be divided into movements as suggested and practiced by many historians of literature. For a movement is the expressionof a certain way of life, and life is movement.

2 

 The study of literary movements is not a study in dilemmas, in some "either, or". To think or to shape, that is not the question. Never was philosophy by itself literature, nor was aesthetics by itself literature. Never two molecules of hydrogen by themselves pro- duce the smallest trace of moisture, nor did one molecule of oxygen quench the thirst of a single fly. The study of literary movements, however, may pose a question of priorities. The question of the chicken and the egg? By no means. Primacy has to be granted to the thought or to the emotion. As stated before, critics have often labelled movements according to some particular or peculiar modish vogues, or according to some stylistic innovations characterized by the use of specific poetic de- vices. We are thinking of trends which are less concerned with ad- dressing or answering a human problem, than with initiating or cap- italizing on some temporary preoccupations. One of the reasons why the lyrical muses are today lying on their death-beds is that they have run out of music-inspiring themes. They lack objects worthy of their songs. Deprived of their original literary powers and, therefore, short of breath, they are humming esoterica and exotica, erotica and sex- ofica. We know only of two creators: God and the poet. As creators, they should both make something out of nothing, if we remember the prime meaning of the verb to create, and if we believe in the role and mission of the literary vates. The poet, to be sure, has always been called la creator only by mere analogy. The Bible and Voltaire teach us that Yahweh alone succeeded in creating ex nihilo the best of all possible worlds, while the poet, in order to create the best pos- sible poem, needs an idea, needs motion and emotion. A poet writ ing ex nihilo ends up with an accusative, he creates nihil. A school like l'art pour l'art is not a literary school, but an aesthetic school. By this I do not necessarily mean to express a value judgment, de- spite the fact that this school aggravated the illness of the muses and that any subsequent poet writing in the same vein may hasten their demise. Style and other formal qualities not only grant a literary work ex- trinsic beauty: they ensure that its content endure, provided that content is worth such a happy fate, "Denn das Gemeine geht klanglos zum Orkus hinab," b," as Schiller says. From the colder parts of the North Atlantic smoked and salted herring are shipped to warmer regions, where they are consumed without hazard to one's health. Thus mas- terpieces are handed down to us from previous centuries: their style remains their conserving and preserving element. Clearly, style as- sumes a function and does not exist by itself. In the modern pantry where poetry has been stored for at least one hundred years we findmore sacks of salt than cans of fish. Brecht illustrates the situation with a story. "Bei der Bemühung um die Form," he says, "geht der Stoff verloren." Mr. Keuner, Brecht's character, worked once with a gardener. One day he had to trim a laurel and give it the shape of a globe for decorative purposes. He worked and cut, and finally the sphere was perfect. His master, inspecting the result of so much labor said: "Well, I see the sphere, but where is the laurel?" Surely, Brecht could have written some other stories in a similar vein. They might have ended like this: "Well, I hear the notes, but where is the music?" or "Well, I see shapes and colors, but where is the painting?" Saint Paul may forgive me if, after Brecht, I paraphrase a passage of his first epistle to the Corinthians. If the poet speaks without a message to be delivered, he is nothing but sounding brass, or a tinkling cym- bal. He indulges in a movement that may be listed under the rubric "cymbalism" not symbolism. Literature expresses a Weltanschauung: it is not a mere Wortanschauung, if I may repeat my dichotomy.

III

These ideas concerning the function of style are far from being ing new. Let us briefly examine the judgment of two well known eigh- teenth-century naturalists, famous also in the history of French liter- ature, Buffon and Bernardin de Saint-Pierre. In his Discours sur le style (1753) the former declares: "Les ouvrages bien écrits sont les seuls qui passent à la postérité," a thought I have already expressed here. "Si l'objet en lui-même est grand", he continues,... "le ton sera non seulement grand, mais sublime." These statements lead up to the well known sentence: "Le style est l'homme même," that is, style is man's heart and mind, an idea echoed the following century by Schopenhauer who declared: "Der Stil ist die Physiognomie des Geistes."

Bernardin de Saint-Pierre's view on the relationship between con- tent and form is similar to that of Buffon. No work passes the test of time without complying with the traditional prerequisites: it has to show formal beauty and has to contain some prominent thought. In the Avis preceding his novel Paul et Virginie he proclaims that form and content jointly produce a work of art, explaining that "le style est à la pensée non ce que l'habit, mais ce que les muscles sont au corps." More than Buffon does, he insists on the primacy of the content. Quoting Horace, he observes that words naturally are born out of the subject matter, out of the thought, out of the physically palpable and the spiritually tangible, that is, ex rebus: "Rem verba sequuntur," literally, "the words follow the thing." The thing, actionand meaning, give birth to the word.The philosophy of stylistics developed and expounded by the twoFrenchmen does not apply only to works of prose. It is fully sup- ported by Emerson, who speaks as a poet most of his poetry con- tains didactic elements when he satirizes those of his colleagues for whom "the finish of the verses is primary." In his essay on The Poet, dated 1844, he states: "It is not meters, but a meter-making argument that makes a poem." He summarizes his doctrine by add- ing: "The thought and the form are equal in the order of time, but in the order of genesis the thought is prior to the form." Forty years later, the hierarchy of values was reversed by Verlaine, who began. his "Art poétique" with this line:Music before anything else,finishing the poem with this statement:And all the rest is literature,that is, futile literary devices or impertinent reflections. Verlaine limits himself to an analysis of auditory merit. There is no utile in- volved. Literature has become mere form.

IV

The reason that we have insisted on the essential and vital unity of content and form in literature should be obvious. While there are movements in which we clearly see literature in its fullest meaning, as previously noticed, there are others in which only certain specific aspects of literature are involved. In other words, movements vary greatly as far as their nature and their function are concerned. Some excerpts from the litany of all isms may immediately spur our aware- ness of that variety. Overlooking the numerous variants of manner- ism and concepts in all major linguistic areas of Renaissance and

Baroque, let us mention without any logical or chronological order some literary or artistic phenomena closer to us: we have existential-ism and socialist realism, dadaism and surrealism, symbolism and modernism, impressionism and expressionism, formalism and con-cretic, avant-gardism and futurism, cubism and absurdism. Some"ismomaniacs" speak of receptionism (meaning the Rezeptionsästhetik) or of cinematism, some others of negrism or of horrorism. None of these "isms" qualifies as a movement in a fundamental sense.It would be possible to establish a bona fide scale indicating the ap-proximate proportion of each of the two basic literary elements-content and form within every single move or school. Some ofthem, obviously, are more concerned with aesthetics for aesthetics'sake than with the aesthetic expression of some significant aspect ofour human condition or of the ultimate meaning of our life. Too often the lines of the "Parnassiens," for example, either narcissistic- ally expound like a sonnet to the sonnet or illustrate an artistic creed. Art, and in particular literary style, has become an end in it self and is not anymore a mea means to an end. In recent times the pendu- lum of movements has shifted more or less regularly from philosophy to aesthetics and back. A synthesis and a system are most urgently needed, holistic rather than atomistic interpretations. One might ask why exclusive "cénacles" and "chapelles" have sodrastically multiplied especially during the last one hundred and fifty years. Their priests and chaplains rarely indicate their overall religious and philosophical affiliation, while they are always most keenly aware of the specific denomination of the church they are promoting and collecting from. As a result, a history of recent literature based on moves and movements might resemble a grandiose collage fresco with no frame of reference or organizing concept, a "theatrum mun- di" without any unified up-stage. This relatively recent multiplica- tion of moves and movements, incidentally, sometimes creates the erroneous impression that in former periods, whatever their longev- ity, each poet had to swim or drown in the same current, while in fact he proved to follow some secondary drift or to be a most inde- pendent personality. The reasons for the recent proliferation of "groupuscules" should be sought not only in the steadily growing effectiveness of the media, but also in the writer' ever-increasing awareness of his right to t to propagate principles born out of his prac tices out of any tradition. By fragmenting the history of literature and philosophy theorists have contributed to the acceleration of history as a whole.

V

Where, then, does the comparatist see the challenge of literary movements? Before addressing that question, let me briefly return to my point of departure. Why should criticism be concerned with movements rather than with periods defined by sets of formal traits and ideational norms? Because time is passing, moving, and therefore the Heraclitian approach to any fragment or aspect of history - whether social, political or literary is the only valid approach. Panta rhei: all studies on anything human are basically studies in changes. A literary period is an abstraction, while literary movements reflect facts. Literature is static only during the short span of time needed for the reading of one single work. As soon as I move to thenext, I will be noticing an intriguing change, and therefore facing thequestion of literary movements. At no point, I should insist, have I suggested that literary criticismshould consist solely of the study of the literary substance, nor have I insinuated that we may well consider the study of literary aesthetics a frivolous occupation. On the grounds of such an assertion a hypo- thetical author of a Literary Commedia would relegate me to the sixth circle of the "Inferno", where I could at length discuss the mat- ter with some other heretics. Man needs truth and beauty together and altogether, at least he needs questing for truth and beauty. Fur- thermore, I am not proposing that in practice the adjective "literary," when applied to a noun designating a movement which in fact is not fully literary, but only stylistic, should be deleted and omitted. It may continue to decorate any movement, even if that movement con- centrates only on particular aspects of literature. There is no reason to quibble over words when their meaning is clear. The word "liter- y often has to be understood metaphorically. It is a synecdoche, ary the whole being given for one part. It was and is definitely my intention, however, to point to basic differences in breadth, in significance, and in the very nature, of scores of movements. They cannot be compared without taking these differences into account. My intention was and is to remember that the history of ideas is an essential part of literary history, that thoughts and emotions, not forms and styles, put the universe in motion, and that thoughts and emotions, therefore, are essential to movements, to cultural dynamics, just as forms and styles are essen- tial to cultural statics, that is, to any serene analysis and quiet con- templation and to the conservation of the content as well. For the comparatist, the challenge of literary movements is if 1 may speak tautologically a challenge of comparison. Confrontations should be made at least on two levels, that of time and that of space. He does not restrict himself to the analysis of one move or movement, knowing that without an inquiry into several, it is not possible to understand even one, just as he does not fully understand any single literature without knowing others. A comparison in space, that is, a study of a particular movement in diverse linguistic areas, represents the other half of a comparatist's duty. Furthermore, since his study comprises several movements he must look for some common denomi- nator or some differentia specifica among them. Thus the challenge of literary movements consists not only of the search for a unifying element in each of them, but in the search for a principle that will make these movements comparable. In the third part of Zur Logik der Kulturwissenschaft, Ernst Cassirer suggests that in fundamental cultural movements he specifically refers to the Renaissance itis necessary to identify the "Richtung," a unity of direction, while a search rch for a unity of "Sein," their passive existence, is a vain enter rise. The entire cultural organism follows a teleological coursewhich may not be detected in each organ seen individually. To con

 COMPARATIVE LITERATURE STUDIES

clude with a comparison, the study of literary movements should beat the same time a differential and an integral calculus: also achallenge!

FRANÇOIS JOST University of Illinois

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an essay by François Jost, a literary critic, discussing the concept of literary movements. Here's a summary:

Jost argues that literary movements are not just periods or styles, but rather dynamic processes that reflect changes in literature and culture. He emphasizes the importance of understanding the unity of content and form in literature, citing examples from classical to modern literature.

Jost criticizes the tendency to focus solely on aesthetics or stylistic innovations, neglecting the philosophical and thematic aspects of literature. He advocates for a holistic approach, considering both the literary substance and aesthetics.

Jost also discusses the challenge of comparing literary movements, suggesting that comparatists should analyze movements across time and space, identifying common denominators and differentia specifica. He concludes that the study of literary movements requires a balance between differential and integral calculus, acknowledging the complexity and dynamism of literary phenomena.

Key points:

- Literary movements are dynamic processes, not static periods or styles.

- Content and form are inseparable in literature.

- Aesthetics and philosophy are equally important in understanding literary movements.

- Comparatists should analyze movements across time and space.

- The study of literary movements requires a balance between differential and integral calculus.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

François Jost's essay "The Challenge of Literary Movements" delves into the intricate nature of literary movements, examining the difficulties inherent in defining, categorizing, and understanding them. Jost’s analysis is not just a reflection on the nature of literary movements themselves, but also on the methodologies and approaches scholars use to study them. He challenges the traditional views that seek to impose order on the fluid and dynamic nature of literary history, arguing for a more nuanced understanding.

Defining Literary Movements:

Jost begins by addressing the fundamental issue of defining literary movements. He notes that literary movements are often understood as groups of writers and works that share certain characteristics, whether they be thematic, stylistic, ideological, or temporal. However, he quickly points out that these categories are often more ambiguous than they appear. The characteristics that define a movement are not always consistent across all its members, and the boundaries between movements are frequently blurred. For instance, while Romanticism is typically associated with an emphasis on emotion and nature, not all Romantic works adhere strictly to these themes, and some works traditionally classified as Romantic might share traits with other movements.

Jost argues that the problem of definition is compounded by the fact that literary movements are not static. They evolve over time, influenced by various factors, including the sociopolitical context, the individual developments of writers within the movement, and the critical reception of their works. This evolution makes it difficult to pin down a movement’s defining characteristics at any given point in time.

The Construction of Literary Movements:

One of Jost’s key points is that literary movements are, to a significant extent, constructed by critics and historians. He explains that literary history is often written retrospectively, with critics looking back and grouping works and authors into movements based on certain perceived similarities. This process is not merely descriptive but also prescriptive; it involves selecting which works and authors are considered representative of the movement and which are not. As a result, the canon of a literary movement can be shaped as much by what is excluded as by what is included.

This construction process is influenced by various cultural, political, and social factors. For instance, during the 19th and early 20th centuries, the canonization of certain literary movements was often driven by nationalistic or ideological agendas. The choice of which authors to include in a movement could reflect the values and priorities of the critics and historians doing the categorization, rather than an objective assessment of the literature itself.

Jost also notes that the retrospective construction of literary movements can obscure the diversity of literary production within a given period. By focusing on a select group of works and authors, critics can create the impression that a movement was more homogenous than it actually was. This can lead to a simplistic understanding of the period and its literature, overlooking the complexities and contradictions that often characterize literary movements.

The Fluidity of Literary Movements:

Jost goes on to discuss the fluid nature of literary movements, emphasizing that they are not confined to specific time periods or geographical locations. Movements can span across centuries and continents, influencing writers in different contexts and leading to the emergence of new, related movements. For example, while Modernism is typically associated with the early 20th century, its influence can be seen in later movements such as Postmodernism, which both continues and reacts against the ideas of Modernism.

This fluidity also means that the influence of a literary movement can extend far beyond its original context. Jost points out that certain movements, like Romanticism or Realism, have had lasting impacts that continue to shape literature in different ways even after the movement itself is considered to have ended. The ideas, themes, and styles associated with these movements can be revived and reinterpreted in new contexts, leading to what Jost calls the "afterlife" of a literary movement.

The Role of Interdisciplinary Approaches:

Given the complexities involved in understanding literary movements, Jost advocates for an interdisciplinary approach to their study. He argues that literary movements cannot be fully understood in isolation from the broader cultural, social, and political contexts in which they emerge. For example, the rise of Modernism in the early 20th century cannot be separated from the social upheavals of the time, including the aftermath of World War I, the rise of industrialization, and the increasing skepticism towards traditional values and beliefs.

Jost suggests that incorporating insights from fields such as history, sociology, and cultural studies can provide a more comprehensive understanding of literary movements. By examining the ways in which literature interacts with other aspects of society, scholars can gain a deeper understanding of the factors that drive the emergence and evolution of literary movements. This interdisciplinary approach also allows for a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between individual works and the movements to which they belong.

Challenges for Literary Scholars:

Jost concludes his essay by reflecting on the challenges that the fluid and constructed nature of literary movements poses for literary scholars. He warns against the temptation to impose rigid categories on literary history, arguing that this can lead to a reductive understanding of literature. Instead, he advocates for a more flexible approach that recognizes the complexity and diversity of literary movements.

One of the key challenges, according to Jost, is the need to balance the desire for order and classification with the recognition that literary movements are inherently messy and difficult to define. He suggests that scholars should approach literary movements with a degree of skepticism, questioning the assumptions and biases that underlie traditional categorizations. This skepticism should be accompanied by a willingness to embrace the ambiguities and contradictions that often characterize literary movements.

Another challenge is the need to recognize the limitations of the retrospective construction of literary movements. Jost argues that scholars should be aware of the ways in which the canonization of certain works and authors can distort our understanding of a movement. By paying attention to the works and authors that have been excluded from the canon, scholars can gain a more complete and accurate picture of a literary movement.

Conclusion:

François Jost’s exploration of "The Challenge of Literary Movements" offers a critical perspective on the ways in which literary movements are defined, constructed, and understood. He challenges the traditional views that seek to impose order on the fluid and dynamic nature of literary history, arguing for a more nuanced and flexible approach. By recognizing the complexities and ambiguities that characterize literary movements, scholars can gain a deeper understanding of the literature of the past and its ongoing influence on the present.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Historical and Biographical Approaches Wilfred Guerin's "A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature"

Introduction

The "Historical and Biographical Approaches" are essential methods in literary criticism that emphasize the importance of an author's life and the historical context in which a literary work was produced. These approaches assert that a deeper understanding of literature can be achieved by exploring the historical period and the author's experiences. This essay delves into the intricacies of these approaches, their theoretical foundations, their application, and their significance in the broader context of literary studies.

1. The Foundations of Historical and Biographical Criticism

The historical and biographical approaches have their roots in the 19th century, influenced by the burgeoning interest in the historical and cultural context of literary works.

1.1 Historical Approach

The Historical Approach to literature involves examining a text within the context of the time and place it was created. This method considers the social, political, and cultural environment that influenced the work, as well as the historical events that may have shaped the themes, characters, and plot. Key figures like Hippolyte Taine emphasized that literature is a product of its historical moment, shaped by factors like race, milieu, and moment.

1.2 Biographical Approach

The Biographical Approach emphasizes the connection between an author’s life and their work. This method posits that understanding an author's personal experiences, beliefs, and personality can provide significant insights into the text. This approach often involves examining the author’s letters, diaries, and other personal documents to draw connections between their life and their literature. Samuel Johnson's statement that "the life of an author can cast light on their works" encapsulates the essence of this approach.

2. Theoretical Underpinnings and Evolution

The development of the Historical and Biographical Approaches is rooted in the broader evolution of literary theory. These methods evolved alongside other critical approaches, reflecting shifts in the understanding of literature's role in society.

2.1 Influence of New Historicism

New Historicism, which emerged in the late 20th century, redefined the Historical Approach by integrating it with cultural studies. This method emphasizes the co-dependence of literature and history, suggesting that literary texts and historical contexts are in constant dialogue. Critics like Stephen Greenblatt have argued that literary works are not just reflections of their time but actively shape and are shaped by the historical moment.

2.2 Psychoanalytic Influence on Biographical Criticism

The Biographical Approach has also been influenced by psychoanalytic theory, particularly the work of Sigmund Freud. Psychoanalytic criticism suggests that understanding the unconscious mind and repressed desires of an author can lead to deeper insights into their works. This perspective adds a psychological dimension to the biographical approach, where the author’s psychological profile is seen as a key to understanding the underlying themes and motifs in their work.

3. Application of Historical and Biographical Approaches

Applying these approaches involves detailed research into the author’s life and the historical context of the text. This section should include examples of how these approaches have been used in literary analysis.

3.1 Historical Analysis Example: Shakespeare's Plays

An example of the Historical Approach can be found in analyses of Shakespeare’s plays, where understanding the Elizabethan era's social, political, and religious contexts is crucial. For instance, "Macbeth" can be better understood by considering the Jacobean anxiety about regicide and the divine right of kings. Understanding the historical context in which Shakespeare was writing, including the political atmosphere under King James I, adds layers of meaning to the play's exploration of power, ambition, and guilt.

3.2 Biographical Analysis Example: Sylvia Plath's Poetry

The Biographical Approach is often applied to the works of poets like Sylvia Plath, whose life experiences profoundly influenced her writing. Plath’s struggles with depression, her tumultuous marriage, and her eventual suicide provide a lens through which her poetry can be interpreted. Her poem "Daddy," for instance, takes on new meanings when viewed in the context of her relationship with her father and her complex feelings of love, hate, and dependency.

4. Strengths and Limitations of Historical and Biographical Approaches

While these approaches offer valuable insights, they are not without limitations. It’s important to recognize both the strengths and potential pitfalls of relying too heavily on historical and biographical contexts in literary analysis.

4.1 Strengths

• Contextual Depth: These approaches provide a deep understanding of the text by situating it within its historical moment or the author's life, leading to richer interpretations.
• Revealing Intentions: They can uncover the author's intentions or the societal issues they were addressing, offering a more comprehensive view of the text.

4.2 Limitations

• Reductionism: There’s a risk of reducing a literary work to merely a reflection of the author’s life or the historical context, overlooking the artistic and imaginative aspects of literature.
• Overemphasis on Authorial Intent: Biographical criticism can sometimes overemphasize the author's intentions, which might not always align with the reader's interpretation or the text's broader cultural impact.

5. Comparative Analysis with Other Approaches

It’s useful to compare and contrast the Historical and Biographical Approaches with other critical methods to highlight their unique contributions to literary analysis.

5.1 New Criticism vs. Historical/Biographical Approaches

New Criticism focuses on the text itself, advocating for a close reading independent of the author's biography or historical context. In contrast, Historical and Biographical Approaches consider external factors crucial for interpretation. This comparison reveals the strengths of each approach and how they can complement each other.

5.2 Reader-Response Criticism

Reader-Response Criticism, which emphasizes the reader's experience of the text, offers a counterpoint to the Historical and Biographical Approaches. While the latter focuses on the author and context, Reader-Response shifts the focus to the reader’s interpretation, suggesting that meaning is created in the interaction between text and reader.

6. Case Studies: In-Depth Application

Providing in-depth case studies of specific works analyzed through the Historical and Biographical lenses can illustrate the approaches’ effectiveness.

6.1 Charles Dickens’ "Great Expectations"

Examining "Great Expectations" through a Historical Approach involves considering the social issues of Victorian England, such as class disparity, industrialization, and the justice system. Understanding Dickens’ own life, his experiences with poverty, and his views on social reform adds another layer of meaning to the novel.

6.2 Virginia Woolf’s "Mrs. Dalloway"

Using a Biographical Approach to analyze "Mrs. Dalloway" involves exploring Woolf’s struggles with mental illness, her thoughts on gender roles, and her experiences as a woman in early 20th-century England. These factors deeply inform the novel's themes of time, memory, and identity.

7. The Relevance of Historical and Biographical Approaches Today

Despite the rise of other critical approaches, the Historical and Biographical methods remain relevant. This section can explore how these approaches continue to be applied in contemporary literary criticism and how they have adapted to new theories and cultural shifts.

7.1 Adaptation to Contemporary Criticism

Modern adaptations of these approaches often integrate elements of postcolonial, feminist, and queer theories, recognizing the intersectionality of historical context, authorial identity, and literary analysis.

7.2 Influence on Cultural and Media Studies

These approaches have also influenced cultural and media studies, where understanding the historical context and creators' backgrounds are essential for analyzing films, television, and other media.

8. Conclusion

The "Historical and Biographical Approaches" offer valuable tools for understanding literature within its broader context. While they have their limitations, these methods provide critical insights into the complex relationship between a text, its author, and the world in which it was created. As literary criticism continues to evolve, these approaches will remain vital, offering a bridge between the text and its multifaceted contexts.

The story of Oedipus

The story of Oedipus is one of the most famous and tragic tales in Greek mythology. It is primarily known from the plays of Sophocles, particularly "Oedipus Rex" (Oedipus the King), "Oedipus at Colonus," and "Antigone." The story explores themes of fate, free will, and the search for truth.

The Prophecy

The story begins with a prophecy. Before Oedipus was born, his parents, King Laius and Queen Jocasta of Thebes, received a terrifying prophecy from the Oracle at Delphi: their newborn son would grow up to kill his father and marry his mother. Horrified by this prediction, Laius and Jocasta decided to avoid this fate by abandoning their son.

Oedipus’ Early Life

Laius and Jocasta ordered a servant to leave the infant Oedipus on a mountainside to die, but the servant, moved by pity, instead gave the baby to a shepherd from Corinth. The shepherd then handed the child over to King Polybus and Queen Merope of Corinth, who raised him as their own son, unaware of his true origins.

The Revelation of the Prophecy

As a young man, Oedipus learned of a prophecy that he would kill his father and marry his mother. Believing that Polybus and Merope were his biological parents, Oedipus fled Corinth to avoid this terrible fate.

The Murder of Laius

During his journey, Oedipus encountered a chariot at a crossroads. The driver and a man in the chariot (unbeknownst to Oedipus, this man was Laius, his real father) rudely ordered Oedipus to move aside. A quarrel ensued, and Oedipus, in a fit of rage, killed the man and the servants with him. Thus, without knowing it, Oedipus had fulfilled part of the prophecy by killing his father.

The Riddle of the Sphinx

After this incident, Oedipus continued his journey and arrived at Thebes, which was plagued by a monstrous Sphinx. The Sphinx posed a riddle to all travelers, devouring those who could not solve it. The riddle was: "What walks on four legs in the morning, two legs at noon, and three legs in the evening?"

Oedipus solved the riddle by answering, "Man," who crawls on all fours as a baby, walks on two legs as an adult, and uses a cane in old age. The Sphinx, defeated, threw herself off a cliff, and Thebes was freed from her terror.

King of Thebes and the Fulfillment of the Prophecy

As a reward for saving the city, Oedipus was made king of Thebes and married the widowed Queen Jocasta, his biological mother. They had four children: two sons, Eteocles and Polynices, and two daughters, Antigone and Ismene. Thus, the prophecy was fulfilled in its entirety, though neither Oedipus nor Jocasta was aware of the truth at this time.

The Plague and the Search for the Truth

Years later, a plague struck Thebes, and the Oracle at Delphi revealed that the plague would only end when the murderer of Laius was found and punished. Oedipus, determined to save his city, vowed to find the killer, not realizing that he was, in fact, searching for himself.

As Oedipus investigated, he uncovered the truth piece by piece. The old shepherd who had saved him as a baby finally revealed Oedipus' true origins, and the devastating realization hit both Oedipus and Jocasta. Jocasta, overwhelmed with horror, hanged herself. Oedipus, in despair, gouged out his own eyes and was exiled from Thebes.

Oedipus’ Later Life

The story continues in "Oedipus at Colonus," where the blind and aged Oedipus arrives at Colonus, near Athens, seeking a place to die. He is accompanied by his daughter Antigone, who has cared for him since his exile. At Colonus, Oedipus is finally granted peace, and he dies a mysterious death, becoming a revered figure in the afterlife.

The Legacy of Oedipus

Oedipus’ story is a profound exploration of fate, self-discovery, and the limits of human understanding. It raises questions about the nature of destiny and whether humans can escape their fated paths. The concept of the "Oedipus complex," developed by Sigmund Freud, is also derived from this myth, referring to a child’s unconscious desire for the opposite-sex parent and rivalry with the same-sex parent.

William Wordsworth's "Preface to Lyrical Ballads" in 30 easy-to-understand points in easy way

 William Wordsworth's "Preface to Lyrical Ballads" in 30 easy-to-understand points:

1. Purpose of the Preface

• Why it was Written: Wordsworth wrote the preface to explain the principles and intentions behind the poems in "Lyrical Ballads."
• Poetry's Redefinition: He wanted to redefine what poetry could be, moving away from the artificial styles of his time.

2. Definition of Poetry

• Spontaneous Overflow: Wordsworth defines poetry as the "spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings."
• Emotion Recollected in Tranquillity: He emphasizes that poetry comes from emotions remembered in a calm state.

3. Subject Matter

• Focus on Ordinary Life: He believed that everyday life and common people are worthy subjects for poetry.
• Simplicity: Poetry should depict simple, everyday events and experiences.

4. Language of Poetry

• Simple Language: Wordsworth argues that poetry should be written in the language of ordinary people.
• Avoiding Artificiality: He rejects the overly complex and stylized language used by many poets of his time.

5. Purpose of Poetry

• Conveying Truth: Poetry’s purpose is to convey universal truths and deep emotions.
• Moral Purpose: Poetry should have a moral purpose, elevating the reader's mind and spirit.

6. Role of the Poet

• Poet as a Teacher: The poet has a duty to teach and guide readers through their work.
• Heightened Sensitivity: Poets are more sensitive and capable of perceiving and expressing deep emotions.

7. Emphasis on Imagination

• Creative Power: Imagination is central to the creation of poetry.
• Blending Reality with Imagination: The poet’s imagination allows them to transform ordinary experiences into something extraordinary.

8. Contrast with Neoclassical Poetry

• Critique of Old Traditions: Wordsworth criticizes the strict rules and artificiality of neoclassical poetry.
• Natural over Artificial: He advocates for a return to nature and simplicity in poetry.

9. Influence of Nature

• Nature as Inspiration: Nature is a central source of inspiration and emotional experience for poetry.
• Connection to Human Experience: Wordsworth believes that there is a deep connection between nature and human emotions.

10. Rejection of Poetic Diction

• Against Elevated Language: Wordsworth argues against the use of overly elevated and stylized language in poetry.
• Everyday Speech: Poetry should reflect the way people actually speak.

11. Importance of Emotions

• Emotion over Reason: Wordsworth emphasizes the importance of emotions in poetry over intellectual reasoning.
• Expression of Feelings: Poetry is primarily an expression of the poet’s feelings.

12. Poetry as Universal

• Accessibility: Poetry should be accessible to all people, not just the educated elite.
• Universal Themes: The themes of poetry should resonate with universal human experiences.

13. Influence of Common People

• Inspiration from the Ordinary: Wordsworth finds inspiration in the lives and experiences of common people.
• Representation of the Marginalized: He seeks to give a voice to those who are often ignored in traditional poetry.

14. Emotion and Reflection

• Reflection in Tranquility: Strong emotions in poetry should be reflected upon in a tranquil state before being expressed.
• Depth of Feeling: The depth of emotion in poetry comes from thoughtful reflection.

15. Impact on the Reader

• Evoking Emotions: Poetry should evoke strong emotions in the reader.
• Moral and Emotional Development: Poetry should contribute to the reader’s moral and emotional growth.

16. Poetry as an Art Form

• Artistic Creation: Poetry is an art that requires creativity and skill.
• Balance of Feeling and Thought: A successful poem balances feeling with thoughtful expression.

17. Critique of Contemporary Poets

• Criticism of Dryness: Wordsworth criticizes contemporary poets for being too focused on intellect and not enough on emotion.
• Advocacy for Change: He calls for a change in the way poetry is written and perceived.

18. Role of the Reader

• Active Engagement: Readers should actively engage with the emotions and ideas presented in poetry.
• Understanding through Feeling: Understanding a poem comes from an emotional connection to its content.

19. Originality in Poetry

• Innovation: Wordsworth encourages poets to be original and innovative in their work.
• Breaking Conventions: He supports breaking away from established poetic conventions.

20. Legacy of Poetry

• Enduring Power: Wordsworth believes that poetry has the power to endure and influence future generations.
• Timelessness: Great poetry is timeless and resonates across different eras.

21. The Poet’s Perspective

• Unique Vision: Poets offer a unique perspective on the world, shaped by their heightened sensitivity.
• Intermediary Role: The poet serves as an intermediary between the natural world and human emotions.

22. Connection to the Past

• Respect for Tradition: While advocating for change, Wordsworth also respects the poetic traditions of the past.
• Learning from Predecessors: Poets should learn from past masters but not be constrained by them.

23. Poetry’s Role in Society

• Social Impact: Poetry can influence society by shaping ideas and emotions.
• Cultural Significance: Poetry reflects and contributes to the cultural life of a society.

24. Simplicity as Strength

• Power in Simplicity: Wordsworth argues that simplicity in language and theme can lead to more powerful and relatable poetry.
• Authenticity: Simple language brings authenticity to poetic expression.

25. Balance between Tradition and Innovation

• Respecting Form: Wordsworth values traditional poetic forms but believes in innovating within them.
• Evolution of Poetry: Poetry should evolve to reflect the changing world and human experience.

26. Influence of Emotion on Imagination

• Emotion Fuels Creativity: Strong emotions stimulate the imagination, leading to creative expression in poetry.
• Dynamic Interaction: There is a dynamic interaction between emotion and imagination in the creation of poetry.

27. Poetic Genius

• Natural Talent: Wordsworth views poetic genius as a natural talent, enhanced by experience and reflection.
• Genius in Simplicity: True poetic genius lies in the ability to convey deep emotions and truths in simple, relatable language.

28. The Poet’s Responsibility

• Moral Duty: Poets have a moral responsibility to use their talent for the greater good, to uplift and inspire.
• Ethical Expression: Poetry should be ethically grounded, reflecting positive values and truths.

29. Reception of Poetry

• Reader’s Response: Wordsworth is aware that not all readers may appreciate his approach, but he believes in the enduring value of sincere poetry.
• Challenge to Readers: He challenges readers to engage with poetry on a deeper emotional and intellectual level.

30. Enduring Influence of the Preface

• Foundational Text: The preface is considered a foundational text in English literary theory and criticism.
• Impact on Romanticism: Wordsworth’s ideas in the preface played a significant role in shaping the Romantic movement in literature.